Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): E016-E016, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-811640

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the positive rate for 2019-nCoV tests and co-infections in Wuhan district.@*Methods@#A total of 8 274 cases in Wuhan were enrolled in this cross-sectional study during January 20 to February 9, 2020, and were tested for 2019-nCoV using fluorescence quantitative PCR. Both respiratory tract samples (nasopharynx, oropharynx, sputum and alveolar lavage fluid) and non-respiratory tract samples (urine, feces, anal swabs, blood and conjunctival sac swabs) were collected. If both orf1ab and N genes are positive, they are classified as nucleic acid test positive group; if both orf1ab and N genes are negative, they are classified as negative group; if single gene target is positive, they are classified as suspicious group. Individuals were divided into male group and female group according to sex. At the same time, 316 patients were tested for 13 respiratory pathogens by multiplex PCR.@*Results@#Among the 8 274 subjects, 2 745 (33.2%) were 2019-nCoV infected; 5 277 (63.8%) subjects showed negative results in the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test; and 252 cases (3.05%) was not definitive (inconclusive result). The age of cases with COVID-19 patients and inconclusive cases was significantly higher than that of cases without 2019-nCoV infection (40 vs 56, t=27.569, P<0.001; 52 vs 56, t=6.774, P<0.001). The positive rate of 13 respiratory pathogens multiple tests was significantly lower in 104 subjects who were positive for 2019-nCoV compared with those in subjects who were negative for 2019-nCoV test (5.77% vs 18.39%, χ2=24.105, P=0.003). Four types of respiratory tract samples and five types of non-respiratory tract samples were found to be positive for 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test.@*Conclusion@#The 2019-nCoV nucleic acid positive rate in male is higher than in female. Co-infections should be pay close attention in COVID-19 patients. 2019-nCoV nucleic acid can be detected in non-respiratory tract samples.

2.
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 341-345, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-871902

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the positive rate for 2019-nCoV tests and co-infections in Wuhan district.Methods:A total of 8 274 cases in Wuhan were enrolled in this cross-sectional study during January 20 to February 9 in 2020, and were tested for 2019-nCoV using fluorescence quantitative PCR. Both respiratory tract samples (nasopharynx, oropharynx, sputum and alveolar lavage fluid) and non-respiratory tract samples (urine, feces, anal swabs, blood and conjunctival sac swabs) were collected. If both orf1ab and N genes are positive, they are classified as nucleic acid test positive group; if both orf1ab and N genes are negative, they are classified as negative group; if single gene target is positive, they are classified as suspicious group. Individuals were divided into male group and female group according to sex. At the same time, 316 patients were tested for 13 respiratory pathogens by multiplex PCR.Results:Among the 8 274 subjects, 2 745 (33.17%) were 2019-nCoV infected; 5 277 (63.77%) subjects showed negative results in the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test; and 252 cases (3.05%) was not definitive (inconclusive result). The age of cases with COVID-19 patients and inconclusive cases was significantly higher than that of cases without 2019-nCoV infection (56>40, t=27.569, P<0.001; 52>40, t=6.774, P<0.001). The positive rate of 13 respiratory pathogens multiple tests was significantly lower in 104 subjects who were positive for 2019-nCoV compared with those in subjects who were negative for 2019-nCoV test (5.77% vs 18.39%, χ 2=24.105, P=0.003). Four types of respiratory tract samples and five types of non-respiratory tract sampleswere found to be positive for 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test. Conclusion:The 2019-nCoV nucleic acid positive rate inmale is higher than infemale. Co-infections should be pay close attention in COVID-19 patients. 2019-nCoV nucleic acid can be detected in non-respiratory tract samples.

3.
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 1537-1539, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-692872

ABSTRACT

Objective To establish the system of high resolution melting for detection of aldehyde dehydro-genase 2(ALDH2) and alcohol dehydrogenase-1B (ADH1B) gene polymorphisms .Methods The short prim-ers were designed for ALDH2 and ADH1B gene .Different PCR products were analyzed using Eva Green dyes after amplification ,which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing .Results The genotypes of ALDH2 rs671 and ADH1B rs1229984 were successfully detected in the same procedure by HRM within 90min ,and the results were consistent with Sanger sequencing .Conclusion The assay of HRM is simple ,rapid ,cost-effective ,and re-liable for the detection of ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphism and it is worthy to be popularized .

4.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases ; (6): 467-472, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-665604

ABSTRACT

Bacterial resistance has become a serious problem that the whole world is facing.Routine bacterial drug resistance testing methods such as K-B test and dilution method are time-consuming and incapable to identify the specific drug resistance mechanism , which can not meet the needs of clinicians. MALDI-TOF MS overcomes the shortcomings of traditional methods and has broad application prospects in detection of bacterial resistance and drug resistance mechanism.This article reviews the recent progress on the application of MALDI-TOF MS in detection of bacterial drug resistance mechanisms.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL